Summary of the Case

Copy of An impeachable act. summary - final.docx

A Summary

An Impeachable Act: Sedition, terrorism within the Civil and Public Service, as defined by Congress; Theft of Veteran Valor

One perception

Title 18 United States Code Section 2384 Sedition Defined- to prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any Law of the United States

Title 6 United States Code Section 101 Terrorism Defined- committing crime, causing injury to influence public policy (equal rights/equal benefit of law)-any activity dangerous to human life in violation with criminal laws of US or any State appears to be intended to intimidate, or coerce a civilian population, to influence policy of government…

Most every Civil and Public Servants duties are written into law or regulations and must be obeyed.

The case for this disabled Veteran spans many years, several states and all levels of the law enforcement and justice system of these United States of America. The case is built upon many previous cases and specific events to identify and prove the possibility of an arising society within America that holds itself beyond the reaches of the law. These people withhold and abuse the rights of regular citizens while effectively granting themselves immunity from such treatment. These civil and public "servants"  successfully abuse their position and authority to keep themselves out of trouble and systematically alienate the very people who actually served to allow such freedom to exist. This form of corruption exists from the exclusive federal jurisdiction of the Veteran Affairs Administration and Federal Courts into the Several States, State Court and local rural counties of America. This case will show evidence to that end, naming specific people and showing the specific instances of such crimes and the failure of  law enforcement and the justice system to properly execute their appointed roles.

This short summary will address the following topics that the case is addressing:

1) The corruption and fraud of the Veterans Affairs (VA) Administration National Healthcare System

2) Why the President is held responsible (Captain of Ship Doctrine of Law)- sets administration policy

3) The corruption of jurisdictions and law enforcement in the courts and their complicity

4) The illegal seizure, occupation and use of private land without compensation or accountability

5) Denying equal right to Veterans in VA care,vs public health care, using law and jurisdiction wrongfully as both sword and shield of law

6) Allowing criminal act, intimidation, threat, and abuse of authority to impair veterans and victims ability to obtain justice and wrongful denial of right to carry legal arms as already decided by Supreme Court and the ease of access for disabled veterans as provided in the Americans with  Disabilities Act (ADA)



1) Such discrimination and prejudice is very evident, that not even rule of court inside court, regulation, statute nor command of US law, Common law, State law or local law will deter such actions to unfairly benefit themselves and their Federal/State/County employer or other chosen, demonstrating the law and rights worthless especially in actions of liability or personal/agency responsibility, whether by incompetence, ignorance, choice or refusal their actions amount to rule over other citizens unfairly and the courts know.

2) In America, Captain of Ship Doctrine of Law demonstrates the President to be responsible for the setting of his administration policy to administer the laws and rights and freedoms of all Americans, Equally and without favor, thereby allowing this evidence of this case to be called upon should America opt for impeachment.

3) The specific laws demonstrated within this case and the case law of the cases building to this point clearly articulate the duties and responsibilities of  the persons identified as defendants, which are known and written into common law. The defendants were not held to the law even when properly reported to the highest administration, officers and multiple courts of this country.

Herein US courts are shown in the act of enforcing a state law in an exclusive federal jurisdiction action where no state law protects the veterans/patients, yet all the responsibilities within the exclusive jurisdiction are failed so as to deny any wrongful act committed, using the exclusive jurisdiction as both sword and shield of law, which is not allowed. Furthermore, to enforce a state law in one instance, then the courts would be required to enforce state law in other instances, not only when flip-flop law benefits the courts’ employers and denies the victims justice. Thus the prior ruling stands that once a jurisdiction achieved it may not be influenced by the jurisdiction lost.

These matters go on to show how certain corrupt state and local authorities have been allowed to commit criminal acts upon the victims of federal wrongdoing thereby making the Veteran out to be a criminal. This severely impairs the victim's ability to seek and find justice and allows the VA to deny him all future benefits while they still take the money provided by Congress to provide care. They not only abuse PATRIOT Act powers and refuse the victims’ rights, but make false charges against the victims and maliciously prosecute them. The law shows that victims shall not be intimidated or impaired in seeking proper legal recourse.  All of these acts coalesce to demonstrate how the corrupt state and local actions upon the victims could not occur if the Federal Authority had done their duty by investigating, enforcing law, protecting common law rights and punishing the offenders. The Federal Authority instead refused to perform their duty, and have defrauded their services .

4) In this case the disabled Veteran additionally shows his family land seized and possessed illegally to build and maintain a highway and multiple utilities with never a single document, no easement, no grant, no condemnation and no compensation in direct violation of state and US Constitutions; in fact he proved he and his family was forced to pay taxes on the land occupied by the highway and utilities for dozens of years, that they could not use , possess or farm.

5) Additionally, when the same veteran then had a  forced and botched  VA surgery immediately followed by an attempt to overdose or administer medication to cause a fatal reaction, he was ejected from the VA hospital, having just been subjected to a forced abdominal bisection  into chest surgery by interns who were neither authorized to perform the surgery and to which the veteran had specifically refused the last minute modifications, whereupon the exclusive jurisdiction was abused to deny the veteran access, records, evidence, witnesses and even immediate treatment or legal counsel, no state law was allowed to protect him, though state law was used to dismiss his case, after the U.S. Attorney had failed to respond to the case properly before default time limits exceeded by weeks and motioned for notice of same before the court to command default per the law.

6) This same veteran recorded the facility director denying medical care with no reason given, when his recordings were discovered he was arrested, ordered to destroy the lawful evidence, then the veterans vehicle was searched without warrant. The vehicle was parked in a place where no jurisdictional change was shown, however he was charged with licensed weapons possession on (this unmarked) federal land even after providing state concealed weapons permits for that state and Florida. This abuse of authority, which is documented in court records, shows the VA tampering with evidence, and intimidating Veterans. Furthermore, the VA has demonstrate the fraud forcing the taxpayers of America to pay for Veterans medical care which it is obviously not providing to veterans. This also demonstrates the intentional acts to deprive disabled veterans of the same right of ease of access as all other Americans, specifically targeting disabled veterans who may be forced to travel hundreds of miles across state lines to get care. They are then denied, by the VA, the right to bear arms lawfully or to park with ease of access, contradicting the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Supreme Court’s favorable ruling. 

 


In conclusion, this same veteran has submitted notices, reports, legal cases & filings and U.S. Inspector General Investigations to: The President’s Administration, the U.S. Attorney General, Inspector General, Department of Justice, FBI, State Representatives, Governors and their administrations, State Attorneys and Inspectors General, special counsels and more.

Yet, this same veteran has failed to find justice; failed to bring an end to the crimes, corruption and abuse; failed to gain proper rights for victims. Most of these criminal acts have been hidden from public view. The preponderance of evidence proves these things have occurred, and have been allowed to occur, in a system with built in corruption led by a society of ruling public authorities whose own interests preclude them from taking lawful action and systematically defrauding Veterans of health care services while continuing to be paid for it.

The fact remains: the unlawful acts of discrimination, personal injury, abuse, prejudice and oppression  must be stopped immediately and the victims must be made whole. These wrongful acts need to be punished so that they will not be repeated upon us, our loved ones and our future generations.

I implore you, look up the legal definitions, read the cases referenced in this filing. Do not let your rights pass by undefended by your voice.

We must act now, before such wrongful enactors gain power, against which the courts will fail to have the ability to correct.

Join us in demanding lawful, peaceful response with the very best of our laws and rights evidenced, instead of our laws and rights being made worthless and weak, without a squeak.

I am James A. Nelson, Plaintiff, Pro Se, I have been fighting this on my own for years in silence of the oppressed, help me to help us help our future. Any mistakes or fault herein is that of mine own and the direct result of the denial or discrimination of public services to defend my rights, person and injuries.

Thank you

James A. Nelson

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment